Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex
I think you're right that it does make a sound, though I do not believe your rationale is particularly helpful.
It is nothing like your old woman analogy; the point to my question is whether 'sound' and 'hearing' - senses - are indeed a socially constucted concept dependant on the existance of someone who is there to 'hear', or whether a sound doesn't exist if it's not heard by someone else... those are the two variables... frankly I find your speaking of trees speaking ridiculous! How is a tree speaking relevant?
|
The 'old women analogy' was just stupid common sense.
So 'sound and 'hearing' senses a socially created concept, dependant on the existance of
someone who is there to 'hear'?
The tree is more stupid common sense.
Now you want a full blown explanation? ok fine.
One man. Senses intact.
One Women. Senses intact.
The man talks to the women
The Women heres the man
Socially dependant?
Yet more stupid common sense.
The senses do what they were intended for.
Heard by someone else?
HAHAHAHA. What do you think?
How about this, one human in existance
only animals around.
What would become of that?
You just answered your stupid questions, with more stupid common sense.
Tree's can talk by the way, swaying branches.. the click and clack.
(Nature has many ways of speaking!.. then again that's not relevant..).
I'll just agree. You are right, i agree i'm wrong, i know nothing.
You are so good at Philosophy.
Spare me the magnitude of your response.
I'll make a better thread myself.
One that explains itself, just for you.
Btw if i'm rude, excuse that.